Introduction: Given the variety of characters
possible in portraying the residents of the Bowery, I will make no effort
to provide guidelines that are in any way specific. I give these suggestions
to serve as a starting point for your impression—a generalization of what
the average woman
may have worn between 1850 and 1865. Each person is encouraged to develop
a specialized costume
appropriate to their persona.
The People: The variety of people living in the areas surrounding
the Bowery in the 1850s was virtually unmatched by any other slum.
There were the various ethnic groups: native-born Americans, Irish, African-American,
and small percentages of dozens of other nationalities. Social classes
ranged from the genteel poor to the depraved, drunken, lowest class.
The Bowery was an area where it was common , if still not entirely respectable,
for a woman to hold a job, something not too common in the rest of the eastern
United States. Usually forced into work by sheer poverty, their occupations
were rarely genteel; ranging from street sweep, to dance hall girl; from
prostitute to store clerk. Another important part of life on the Bowery was
the presence of missionaries and reformers, often upper-middle class women
who had the spare time and money to devote to such endeavors. They
probably did not live in the slum itself, nevertheless their presence was
an important part of the Bowery scene.
Regarding Fashions: I feel safe in assuming a time lag of at
least two years in the fashions of residents of the Bowery. While circumstances
differedfrom person to person, it is probable that a good portion of the
garments worn were bought second-hand, which immediately accounts for a
two year lag. Add to that the size of families, economic and social positions,
and country of origin, and you have a significant delay in the adoption
of current fashion.
Footwear: When worn at all, leather ankle boots are adequate. Shoes
are encouraged to be worn at reenactments, for health and safety reasons.
-Wool stockings, generally in variations of white,
or browns or blacks, reaching above the knee. May be held up by a string
or a band of elastic above or below the knee, or knotted below the knee.
Chemise: Absolutely necessary. Made of white cotton, with
short sleeves, and reaching to mid-calf.
Drawers: Not likely, or necessary. Possible exceptions
are for war-time reenactments when a cage crinoline is worn.
Petticoats: Two to six petticoats can be worn. White
cotton is most common, followed by wool flannel.
Supportive Underpinnings: While the cage crinoline was patented
in 1856, it is unlikely that it had made its way to the Bowery by the
time of our portrayal. Exceptions may be for a war-time reenactment
for more fashion-conscious personae. Instead, a horsehair petticoat, or
‘crinoline’, can be worn. Please note that the LOWERMOST skirt in the
layers would be a narrow cloth petticoat, and the one made from horsehair
would only be worn over this. Additional cloth petticoats can then be layered
over this combination. A corded petticoat may be substituted, to prevent
the skirts from becoming entangled in the legs.
Corset or Stays: Highly recommended. A true corset may be worn,
made of cotton twill and stiffened with steel boning, or a pair of stays
stiffened with cording as an alternative. The style of corset did not change
dramatically between the 1850s and 60s, although the waist did
become somewhat shorter.
Dress: The most common for wear during the day would be a
one-piece dress, consisting of a fitted bodice and an attached skirt.
Possible fabrics include wool, cotton, silk, and combinations of the three.
A separate basque bodice and skirt were sometimes worn during the 50s. An
alternative is the two piece ‘sack and petticoat’, or loose-fit bodice,
and separate skirt. This outfit tended to be less formal than the
dress, being a
descendant of the 18th c. Shortgown and Petticoat. It shows up
in a number of engravings and paintings of working class women in the 1850s.
Outerwear: A voluminous wool shawl seems to have been an almost
constant accessory, judging from the available images of women.
Mantles, coats, and capes may also have been worn.
Headwear: Bonnets show up in a surprising percentage of images;
even the famous engravings of two prostitutes shows them look fairly respectable
in the demure headgear. Straw was the cheapest sort, but drawn silk was also
fairly common. Broad, floppy straw hats enjoyed a
vogue in the 1850s, and were probably worn to some extent by the more
audacious girls.
Hair: Hair in the 50s was parted into three sections, with
the back section pinned into a coiled bun, and the sides arranged into smooth,
wide puffs above the ears. Some women, especially those with naturally curly
hair, wore their side hair in corkscrew curls. Hair was shiny and well-oiled,
either naturally or with added pomades.
Make-up: The bourgeois and respectable may have avoided obvious
make-up, but those outrageous girls of the Lower East Side didn’t necessarily
follow popular norms. You are encouraged to research and employ make-up (although
period recipes are to be used with extreme
caution, as many of them are poisonous) if it is appropriate
for your portrayal, e.g. that of a dance hall girl.
Miscellaneous: Aprons, gloves, purses, baskets, etc.
As progressive reenactors, we realize that the pursuit of authenticity
is an ongoing and never-ending process. Therefore, you are not required to
have a perfect wardrobe when you begin...or even after five years. However,
we put strong emphasis on continuous improvement. Personal mentoring, sewing
assistance, and research help are all available at your request. For
questions, comments, or pleas for help please contact Alaina Zulli at
motozulli@yahoo.com